Standard No.:	GB/T 40283.4-2023
English Name:	Automation systems and integration—Interoperability of capability units for manufacturing application solutions—Part 4: Capability unit assessment for the manufacturing application requirements
Chinese Name:	自动化系统与集成 制造应用解决方案的能力单元互操作 第4部分：制造应用需求的能力单元评估
Chinese Classification:	J07    Computer application
Professional Classification:	GB    National Standard
ICS Classification:	25.040.01 25.040.01    Industrial automation systems in general 25.040.01
Issued by:	SAMR; SAC
Issued on:	2023-11-27
Implemented on:	2024-6-1
Status:	valid
Language:	English
File Format:	PDF
Word Count:	16500 words
Price(USD):	495.0
Delivery:	via email in 1~5 business day

GB/T 40283.4-2023 Automation systems and integration - Interoperability of capability units for manufacturing application solutions - Part 4: Capability unit assessment for the manufacturing application requirements 1 Scope This document specifies the search methodology from software unit catalogues for acquiring candidate capability units which satisfy the manufacturing application requirements. 2 Normative references The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. ISO 16100-1 Industrial automation systems and integration - Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability - Part 1: Framework Note: GB/T 19902.1-2005, Industrial automation systems and integration - Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability - Part 1: Framework (ISO 16100-1:2002, IDT) ISO 16100-3 Industrial automation systems and integration - Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability - Part 3: Interface services, protocols and capability templates Note: GB/T 19902.3-2006, Industrial automation systems and integration - Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability - Part 3: Interface services, protocols and capability templates (ISO 16100-3:2005, IDT) ISO 16100-5 Industrial automation systems and integration - Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability - Part 5: Methodology for profile matching using multiple capability class structures Note: GB/T 19902.5-2011, Industrial automation systems and integration - Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability - Part 5: Methodology for profile matching using multiple capability class structures (ISO 16100-5:2009, IDT) ISO 16100-6 Industrial automation systems and integration - Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability - Part 6: Interface services and protocols for matching profiles based on multiple capability class structures Note: GB/T 19902.6-2012, Industrial automation systems and integration - Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability - Part 6: Interface services and protocols for matching profiles based on multiple capability class structures (ISO 16100-6:2011, IDT) ISO 16300-1 Automation systems and integration - Interoperability of capability units for manufacturing application solutions - Part 1: Interoperability criteria of capability units per application requirements ISO 16300-2 Automation systems and integration - Interoperability of capability units for manufacturing application solutions - Part 2: Capability templates and software unit cataloguing ISO 16300-3 Automation systems and integration - Interoperability of capability units for manufacturing application solutions - Part 3: Verification and validation of interoperability among capability units Note: GB/T 40283.3-2021, Automation systems and integration - Interoperability of capability units for manufacturing application solutions - Part 3: Verification and validation of interoperability among capability units (ISO 16300-3:2017, IDT) 3 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 16100-1, ISO 16100-6, ISO 16300-1, ISO 16300-2, ISO 16300-3 and the following apply. ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses: ——ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp ——IEC Electropedia: available at http://www.electropedia.org/ 3.1 capability class element within the capability profiling (3.5) method that represents capabilities with regard to the capability unit’s role in a manufacturing activity 3.2 capability class structure hierarchy of capability classes Note: This structure is intended for modelling capability aggregation hierarchies in the target domains of ISO 16100-1:2009, Figure 2. [SOURCE: ISO 16100-6:2018, 3.2, modified] 3.3 capability element element used to indicate that a particular capability is supported by the entity or manufacturing software unit to which the element belongs [SOURCE: ISO 16300-1:2018, 3.3] 3.4 capability profile instance of capability template filled with the concrete values corresponding to the target manufacturing software unit [SOURCE: ISO 16300-1:2018, 3.4] 3.5 capability profiling selection of a set of offered services defined by a particular interface within a software interoperability framework [SOURCE: ISO 16100-1:2009, 3.5] 3.6 capability template template schema representing a capability class [SOURCE: ISO 16300-1:2018, 3.6] 3.7 capability unit unit of a type (i.e. mechanical, electrical, electronic, hardware, and/or software, etc.) intended to support the execution of a particular task. [SOURCE: ISO 16300-1:2018, 3.7] 3.8 manufacturing domain data; MDD information about manufacturing resources, manufacturing activities, or items exchanged among manufacturing resources within a particular manufacturing domain [SOURCE: ISO 16300-2:2019, 3.9] 3.9 manufacturing domain model; MDM particular view of a manufacturing domain, consisting of manufacturing domain data and relationships among them, corresponding to the domain's applications [SOURCE: GB/T 19902.5-2011, 3.5] 3.10 manufacturing software unit; MSU class of software resource, consisting of one or more manufacturing software components, performing a definite function or role within a manufacturing activity while supporting a common information exchange mechanism with other units Note 1: A software unit can be modelled using UML as a software object. Note 2: In this document, “capability unit” stands for “manufacturing software unit (MSU)”. [SOURCE: ISO 16100-1:2009, 3.18, modified] 3.11 matched MSU capability profile MSU capability profile which fulfils the capabilities defined in the required capability profile 3.12 software capability description dictionary collection of manufacturing domain data in capability elements to describe the capability of software, where all manufacturing domain data are uniquely identified [SOURCE: ISO 16300-2:2019, 3.12] 3.13 software unit catalogue collection of capability profiles using the same capability template representing one or more manufacturing software units for the same manufacturing activity in the activity tree [SOURCE: ISO 16300-2:2019, 3.13] 3.14 MSU provider entity that provides the manufacturing software units (3.10) which are registered in the software unit catalogue (3.13) [SOURCE: ISO 16300-2:2019, 3.15] 3.15 MSU user entity that uses the manufacturing software units (3.10) which are registered in the software unit catalogue (3.13) 4 Overview of capability unit assessment 4.1 Brief of software unit catalogue The software capability description dictionary is used to understand the semantics of capability profiles in the software unit catalogue. The software capability description dictionary defines the capability elements to describe the capabilities of the software. Figure 1 shows the software unit catalogue defined in ISO 16300-2. The software unit catalogue refers to the software capability description dictionary to translate the semantics of the capability template and the capability profiles. Each MSU has one capability profile which belongs to one capability template in the software unit catalogue. An example of a capability template is shown in Annex A.